New York City Mayor De Blasio Just Banned Another Common Product

hardeesburger

New York Mayor Bill de Blasio has seen the enemy and has conquered it. In this case, however, the enemy is the Styrofoam container used by restaurants, diners and containers for takeout meals and drinks.

According to a Reuters report, de Blasio has enacted a ban that will make the use of expanded polystyrene – a.k.a. Styrofoam – by the city’s dining and food retail outlets illegal as of July 1. In an act of mayoral benevolence, de Blasio will allow a six-month grace period to enable the switch away from polystyrene containers – but starting on New Year’s Day 2016, anyone packing a veggiee burger or a serving of General Tso’s chicken into this type of container will be slapped with a fine.  (However, the exact fine schedule has yet to be determined.) Restaurants that bring in less than $500,000 in profits a year will be eligible for a waiver that will make them exempt from the ban.


The ban also covers the use of so-called “packing peanuts” that are ubiquitous in moving and storage.

“These products cause real environmental harm and have no place in New York City. We have better options, better alternatives, and if more cities across the country follow our lead and institute similar bans, those alternatives will soon become more plentiful and will cost less,” said de Blasio. “By removing nearly 30,000 tons of expanded polystyrene waste from our landfills, streets and waterways, today’s announcement is a major step towards our goal of a greener, greater New York City.”

The ban is not exactly an original idea – de Blasio’s predecessor, Michael Bloomberg, first proposed it in February 2013, but that initially attracted as much popular support as his attempt to ban XL-sized soft drinks.

The city will start fining violators of the ban after a six-month grace period ending in January 2016. Administration officials have not yet determined a fine schedule, a spokesman said.

But do the costs of this ban outweigh any perceived environmental benefits?  Both the New York State Restaurant Association and the NYC Hospitality Alliance point out that the non-polystyrene containers that are touted as being environmentally friendly cost much more, and this added expense could be passed on to consumers with higher prices on their takeout items.

And, to add insult to injury, this action might be a waste of time. The Competitive Enterprise Institute, citing data culled by a research group called Franklin Associates, noted in an August 2011 report:

“[T]he average 16-ounce polystyrene cup uses a third less energy, produces 50 percent less solid waste by volume, and releases a third less of so-called “green house gases” than does a 16-ounce paper cup with a sleeve. Over their lifecycles, polystyrene packaging products require 20 to 30 percent less water than do paper alternatives.”


In his announcement, de Blasio cited input by Dart Container Corporation in his decision. But in November 2013, shortly after de Blasio’s election, that company put forth a recyling offer that would have cancelled the need for the ban while making money for the cash-strapped city.

“New York City pays $86 a ton to landfill foam,”said Michael Westerfield, Dart’s director of recycling, in an interview with the New York Post. “We’re offering to pay $160 [a ton] to recycle it.”



[widget:text-54]

Phil Hall

About Phil Hall

Phil Hall has been (among other things) a United Nations-based radio journalist, the president of a public relations and marketing agency, a financial magazine editor, the author of six books (soon to be seven) and a horror movie actor.

Comments

Trackbacks

  1. […] NYC Mayor De Blasio Just Banned Another Common Product, by Phil Hall, at thefederalistpapers.org. He is banning Styrofoam, which is used in such things as Styrofoam containers for food by restaurants and packing peanuts used in shipping and storage. De Blasio said, “…We have better options, better alternatives,……and those alternatives will soon become more plentiful and will cost less.” The Mayor apparently understands the concept that a greater supply reduces the price. But does he understand that if there is a lower cost better product it will be supplied by the market. If you ban something, obviously the next best lower cost alternative will take the banned products place. Oh the cost of being green. […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *